White House court filing says Musk is not the official leader of DOGE


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • The White House said Elon Musk is not technically the Department of Government Efficiency’s leader. A court filing states, “Mr. Musk is not the U.S. DOGE Service Administrator.”
  • The new information comes from an affidavit in a case brought against Musk by 14 states’ attorneys general to stop him from maintaining control over federal agencies.
  • Officials at the White House did not say who is the actual administrator for DOGE.

Full Story

The Department of Government Efficiency is expanding its reach within the federal government, aiming to conduct a massive overhaul. But one question remains: Who’s really in charge? It turns out Elon Musk isn’t technically leading the department.

What’s in the court filing?

The new information came from an affidavit filed by the White House Monday, Feb. 17 in a case brought against Musk by more than a dozen states’ Democratic attorneys general to stop him from exercising control over federal agencies.

According to the filing signed by Joshua Fisher, director of Office of Administration at the White House, Musk is “not an employee of the U.S. DOGE Service, or the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization,” adding “Mr. Musk is not the U.S. DOGE Service Administrator.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Fisher instead called him a “non-career special government employee” comparing Musk’s role to Anita Dunn, a long-time adviser to former President Joe Biden.

The judge did, however, not say who the administrator of DOGE actually is.

The filing states Musk can only advise the president and communicate the president’s directives, and has no formal authority to make government decisions himself.

However, Trump’s past statements have suggested otherwise. 

In December 2024, he said that Musk, alongside Vivek Ramaswamy, would be leading DOGE.

After Ramaswamy’s departure from the agency, Trump continued to refer to Musk as its leader.

The technical designation in the affidavit does not appear to impact Musk being the key person representing DOGE, which he has touted, appearing alongside Trump to talk about its mission.

What happened at the court hearing?

According to ABC News, during a recent court hearing for the case, the judge had concerns over the department’s unstructured operations.

“DOGE appears to be moving in no sort of predictable and orderly fashion,” Judge Tanya Chutkan said. “This is essentially a private citizen directing an organization that’s not a federal agency to have access to the entire workings of the federal government.”

However, ABC News also reported that Chutkan appears to be leaning toward denying a request to temporarily block DOGE from firing employees or accessing federal department records.

She described the states’ request as “prophylactic,” raising doubts about issuing an order because the plaintiffs could not prove concrete harm stemming from DOGE’s actions. 

The judge heard arguments on Monday, Feb. 17, when federal courts were closed for President’s Day, to consider an emergency request by the attorneys general who filed the suit.

The states said their ability to carry out educational and other programs were at risk. They accused the DOGE team of using data collected from agency systems to dismantle initiatives and direct mass firings.

What is Musk saying about DOGE criticism?

Musk responded to criticism of DOGE in a post to X on Monday. 

“I love the people. We just want to fix the waste and fraud that is bankrupting the country,” Musk said. “The scrutiny on me is extreme, so it’s not like I could ‘get away’ with something, nor do I have any incentive to do so.”

The judge said she plans to make a ruling on the case sometime Tuesday, Feb. 18.

Jodie Hawkins (Senior Producer) and Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize Musk's lack of decision-making authority and presents a legal challenge to Trump's actions, suggesting a political struggle.
  • Media outlets in the center portray Musk's critics as alleging a "hostile takeover," emphasizing the contentious nature of the situation without providing extensive concision on the implications.
  • Media outlets on the right focus on the ongoing legal challenges, emphasizing a neutral perspective without highlighting public sentiment or political implications.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

38 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The White House stated that Elon Musk is a senior adviser and not an employee of the Department of Government Efficiency, and lacks decision-making authority.
  • Joshua Fischer, Director of the Office of Administration, confirmed that Musk is a non-career special government employee and has no formal government decision-making power.
  • The filing was in response to a lawsuit claiming Trump illegally delegated executive powers to Musk in violation of the Constitution.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The White House clarified that Elon Musk is not an employee of the Department of Government Efficiency and holds no authority to make decisions, as stated in a court filing by Joshua Fisher, director of the Office of Administration.
  • Legal challenges against Musk's authority have been filed, questioning his capability to lead the Department of Government Efficiency amid ongoing firings in federal agencies.
  • Democratic lawmakers have accused Musk of attempting a "hostile takeover" of the government, a claim that both Musk and the Trump administration deny, according to the White House's statements.
  • A focus group by Engagious/Sago shows that 8 of 11 participants approve of Musk's Department of Government Efficiency efforts, highlighting a divided public opinion.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Trump administration clarified that Elon Musk is not an employee of DOGE and serves as a White House advisor, as stated by Joshua Fisher, director of the Office of Administration.
  • Joshua Fisher noted that Musk has no formal authority and can only advise the president and communicate directives.
  • The lawsuit from 14 state attorneys general alleges that Musk's actions violate the Constitution's appointments clause and disrupt federal agencies.
  • U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan expressed skepticism about the lawsuit's arguments regarding harm caused by Musk and DOGE.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™